Traceable identity
A program must have an identifiable developer and a primary source describing the biological approach.
Open evidence dataset · Version 2026.10
Hair Cloning Development Index
A source-labelled dataset of development programmes and human studies. It distinguishes clinical testing from commercial availability and company statements from registered evidence.
6programs
3human studies
3technology classes
0approved cloning therapies
Latest evidence check
No new stage or registry-status changes
On 27 October 2026, the three tracked ClinicalTrials.gov records and the six programme sources were checked against the published index. The registry statuses and dates were unchanged.
HairClone’s current materials continue to describe early experimental injections without published outcomes, while OrganTech’s latest hair-regeneration announcement remains the non-binding European conditioned-medium memorandum recorded in version 2026.10. Neither changes the programmes’ evidence-stage classifications.
Citable field map
Three development paths, three different evidence levels
Evidence status as checked 27 October 2026
Download the evidence map (SVG)CC BY 4.0 · Cite Hair Cloning Intelligence, version 2026.10
Program index
Companies and development programs
Latest evidence check: 27 October 2026
Last material revision: 19 October 2026
| Program | Technology | Evidence stage | Last verified | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HairCloneUnited Kingdom / Guatemala | Follicle rejuvenationAutologous follicle-cell expansion and injection | Early clinical evaluation — company reportedThe company says an early patient cohort has begun receiving cells expanded from banked follicle tissue. No registered protocol or public treatment results were located. | 19 Oct 2026 | Open ↗ |
| EpibiotechSouth Korea | Follicle rejuvenationAutologous dermal papilla cell product EPI-001 | Phase I/II — recruitingClinicalTrials.gov lists a 42-participant dose-escalation and placebo-controlled study that began in January 2026. | 19 Oct 2026 | Open ↗ |
| OrganTechJapan | De novo follicle regenerationEngineered follicular units using epithelial, dermal papilla and supporting cells | Preclinical / preparing clinical researchThe de novo platform remains preclinical. A September 2026 non-binding European collaboration memorandum initially concerns an adjacent conditioned-medium programme and does not change this stage. | 19 Oct 2026 | Open ↗ |
| Stemson TherapeuticsUnited States | De novo follicle regenerationiPSC-derived engineered follicular units intended to create new follicles | Preclinical developmentThe company describes engineered follicular units and has reported preclinical human-hair formation work; no recruiting human trial was located. | 19 Oct 2026 | Open ↗ |
| RepliCel / RCH-01Canada / Japan | Follicle rejuvenationAutologous dermal sheath cup cells | Clinical evidence; next development step unclearA 19-participant Phase I/II registry study is complete, and a separate Japanese dose-ranging study was published. The source page discusses further study plans. | 19 Oct 2026 | Open ↗ |
| Acorn BiolabsCanada / United States | Adjacent: follicle-derived secretomeAutologous secreted factors produced from cultured follicle-derived cells | Recruiting controlled studyA 60-participant registered study is testing secretome injections. This is not cell transplantation or new-follicle engineering. | 19 Oct 2026 | Open ↗ |
Human evidence
Registered studies
Registration does not establish approval or efficacy.
| Registry | Study | Status | Intervention | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT07618195Phase I / II | Study of EPI-001 in androgenetic alopeciaEpibiotech · 42 estimated | RecruitingStarted Jan 2026 · completion estimated Jun 2029 | Autologous dermal papilla cells injected into the scalpCore cell-therapy study | Registry ↗ |
| NCT07107841Not applicable | Autologous hair-follicle secretome for androgenetic alopeciaAcorn Biolabs · 60 estimated | RecruitingStarted Oct 2025 · completion estimated Sep 2027 | Autologous hair-follicle-derived secretome injected into the scalpAdjacent secretome study | Registry ↗ |
| NCT01286649Phase I / II | Autologous hair-follicle cells for androgenetic alopeciaTrichoScience Innovations / RepliCel lineage · 19 actual | CompletedStarted Dec 2010 · completed Feb 2017 | Autologous hair-follicle cells versus cell-medium controlHistorical cell-therapy study | Registry ↗ |
Methodology
Inclusion criteria and stage classification
Endpoint clarity
We label whether the aim is rejuvenation, multiplication, new-follicle creation or an adjacent technology.
Evidence classification
Stages are assigned using registered studies, reported results and reproducible research. Proposed launch dates and fundraising statements are not treated as evidence.
Treatment of uncertainty
Company statements remain labelled. Missing protocols, results or independent confirmation are recorded explicitly.
The downloadable dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. Reuse is welcome with attribution to Hair Cloning Intelligence and a link to this page. Inclusion is not endorsement.
Change log
A record of what changed
Weekly evidence check completed; dataset unchanged. Registry records, programme sources, regulators and recent literature were reviewed. HairClone’s current FAQ further identifies its early work as protocol optimisation without assured outcomes; no evidence stage changed.
Version 2026.10 published. Recorded HairClone’s company-reported start of injections in an early cohort and OrganTech’s non-binding European conditioned-medium collaboration. Registry statuses and evidence-stage classifications were unchanged.
Evidence check completed; dataset unchanged. Registry status and principal programme sources were reviewed. No stage or status change met the revision threshold.
Version 2026.08 published. Added a reusable dataset, explicit inclusion method and source-level program classification.
Clinical landscape refreshed. Verified EPI-001, Acorn and historical RepliCel records; updated HairClone and OrganTech milestones.
Professional use
From open dataset to monitored change record
The sample professional brief shows how source changes, evidence implications and unresolved questions would be recorded for decision-makers.
Dataset updates
Receive material revisions to the index
The Follicle Brief records changes in source status, development stage and published evidence. Routine checks with no material change remain visible in the change log.